This painting, attributed to the Dutch artist Pieter van der Muelen at the court of William and Mary, shews William III's landing on the coast of Ireland in 1690. It was bought by Stormont in 1933 and there were cries of cheer at its acquisition (at the costly sum of £209 and four shillings). But the cheers gave way to bewilderment and hostility at its unveiling because if you look closely there is a rather popish looking fellow floating in the clouds: pope Innocent XI in fact, in posture of benediction, sanctioning with apostolic power the Protestant war of William of Orange against his enemy King James VII and II, who was in miserable league with the "Sun King" of France. You see, William was allied with the Papacy against Louis XIV of France, who dominated the politics of the age. Perhaps the vandals who threw red paint over the figure of Innocent XI in this painting were not aware of the loveless league of Calvinist Billy and the Papacy? But it's interesting that upon hearing the outcome of the Battle of the Boyne, the pope ordered Te Deums all over the Papal State. It's reminiscent of pope Adrian IV's hearty endorsement of Henry II's conquest of Ireland in the bull Laudabiliter. So much for Papal sanction of Irish nationalism and the old Celtic order in Ireland!
There is an interesting article on the alliance of Dutch Billy and the Papacy here. One could well ask why Rome castigated France for its tenuous alliance with the Ottoman Empire when it was simultaneously funding a Protestant prince in his wars against France. Traddies might say that the old Temporal Power had some worth but I can't personally see it.
I call upon readers to pray for a United Ireland. God save The Queen!
People like to forget this, as it doesn't fit the narrative of the Glorious Revolution against popery and for «democracy» (and even religious liberty, parodoxally).
ReplyDeleteI have no sympathy for the vandal-king Louis XIV who bombarded Brussels, but at least he never betrayed this alliance to my knowledge, and while the French succession crisis did eventually muck things up a bit, France did support the Jacobite cause up to the 1760s. But how has the Papacy betrayed the Jacobites time and again! Fattening up the Old Pretender in Rome, only to betray his heir. And cardinal Henry Benedict Stuart was reduced to poverty by assisting the Papacy.
That said, I don't see any point in being a Jacobite after the demise of the House of Stuart and the anglicisation of the Hanoverian dynasty. I quite like HRH The Prince of Wales, perhaps he could ascend to the throne as Charles IV so we can close the issue. ;-) Of course, on the other hand, perhaps I shouldn't have an opinion on these matters.
The adoration of King William III, and mainly the masonic Orange Order, seem quite repugnant. I am not familiar with their history, but I can't help but wonder whether they're responsible for a lot of the Irish tension.
And the Cardinal Duke of York was a notorious homosexual who filled his dwelling with lots of handsome young men!
DeleteI would join the Orange Order myself but I am automatically disqualified for having been baptised a Roman Catholic.
Unless I'm missing something, I daresay this masonic order and republicanism are two sides of the same coin. Then again, to me Irish politics seem to be rife with contradictions in ideology and values for both «sides».
Delete